From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Eric Nielsen" <ericnielsen(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: I think I know what I'm doing wrong, but.... |
Date: | 2001-01-06 17:04:18 |
Message-ID: | 17336.978800658@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
"Eric Nielsen" <ericnielsen(at)earthlink(dot)net> writes:
>> However the insert fails, with a referential integrity problem. I _think_
>> this is because it tries to do the rule's trigger before actually doing
>> the original select, so the key does not exist.
I think you are right. Non-INSTEAD rule actions are executed before the
original query is carried out. I have argued in the past that this is
stupid for ON INSERT rules, which would be better done after the
original query, but I haven't had any luck getting agreement to change
it.
>> Is there a solution using rules,
Only if you can use a delayed referential integrity check that isn't
checked till end of transaction. I don't know offhand if we even
implement such a feature, let alone whether it'd be OK for your
application logic.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eric Nielsen | 2001-01-06 21:35:44 | Re: Create Table Scripts |
Previous Message | Chuck Kimber | 2001-01-06 15:46:50 | Re: Create Table Scripts |