From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Date: | 2004-04-29 22:11:57 |
Message-ID: | 17330.1083276717@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> *If* June 1st comes along, and Win32 isn't ready, there is nothing wrong
> with freezing the code *except* for a pending Win32 patch ...
Yeah there is ...
In the first place it's unfair to other developers to make schedule
slips at the last moment, and especially to *plan* to do so. I would
prefer we determine at least two weeks, preferably a month, in advance
whether there is going to be a schedule change. I think it's entirely
appropriate to decide now whether we are going to hold to June 1 feature
freeze or slip it. That gives other people a chance to do useful work
while we approach the deadline.
In the second, any Win32 issues that remain unresolved as of June 1
are likely to be major enough (in terms of code impact) that we can't
realistically contemplate slipping in post-beta patches for them.
The fallback position is going to have to be no (supported) Win32 port
in 7.5, not "we'll fix this in beta".
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-04-29 22:14:15 | Small OS ports & Handheld devices |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-04-29 21:46:11 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |