Re: Client/Server compression?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Client/Server compression?
Date: 2002-03-14 20:29:19
Message-ID: 17329.1016137759@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> This may be of value for users with low bandwidth connectivity to their
>> servers or where bandwidth may already be at a premium.

> But don't slow links do the compression themselves, like PPP over a
> modem?

Even if the link doesn't compress, shoving the feature into PG itself
isn't necessarily the answer. I'd suggest running such a connection
through an ssh tunnel, which would give you encryption as well as
compression.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Copeland 2002-03-14 20:39:43 Re: Client/Server compression?
Previous Message Mark Pritchard 2002-03-14 20:26:44 Re: Client/Server compression?