Re: Allowing pg_recvlogical to create temporary replication slots

From: Dickson Guedes <guedes(at)guedesoft(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Torsten Foertsch <tfoertsch123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allowing pg_recvlogical to create temporary replication slots
Date: 2024-11-10 23:10:25
Message-ID: 173128022560.140664.6941919371305643766.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Torsten!

While reviewing your patch for pg_recvlogical, I’m curious about the
expected behavior when using --if-not-exists in conjunction with --temporary-slot.

If an existing slot is reused under these options, will it behave as
a temporary slot and be removed when the connection ends? Or the
existing slot should remain persistent despite the --temporary-slot flag?

--
Dickson S. Guedes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-11-11 00:21:31 Re: pg_stat_statements: Avoid holding excessive lock
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2024-11-10 22:41:31 Re: proposal: schema variables