Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new GUC var: autovacuum_process_all_tables
Date: 2009-02-09 17:37:17
Message-ID: 17309.1234201037@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Right. What I'm saying is that if it *didn't* require a sighup, then
>> users could cronjob starting and stopping Autovac themselves.

> Hmm, I'm not sure I understand what you're suggesting. Maybe what you
> want is that we have a SQL-accesible function that sends SIGHUP to the
> postmaster?

Like, say, pg_reload_conf()? But actually a cron job would almost
certainly find it more pleasant to use pg_ctl reload and never bother
with a database connection at all.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2009-02-09 17:41:25 Re: WIP: fix SET WITHOUT OIDS, add SET WITH OIDS
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-02-09 17:32:54 Re: I can see beta now