Re: elog() patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: elog() patch
Date: 2002-03-02 23:19:54
Message-ID: 17307.1015111194@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is this what you were looking for? I set client_min_messages to the max
> of debug5 and the output is attached.

If the DBA wants to do that, I don't have a problem with it. I'm
wondering what happens if an unprivileged user tries to do it,
via either PGOPTIONS or Peter's new user/database-local options.

Please note also that I'm wondering about the messages emitted during
an authorization *failure*, not a successful connection.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-03 02:46:05 Re: elog() patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-02 23:00:43 Re: elog() patch