| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Automatic transactions in psql |
| Date: | 2002-02-22 16:17:25 |
| Message-ID: | 17306.1014394645@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, status on this? Seems we can't apply the patch as-is because of
> reliability of the status display. Do people wnat a TODO item? I don't
> think I want to make an incompatible protocol change for this feature.
I believe Fernando Nasser at Red Hat is currently working on backend
changes to do this properly; so I recommend we not apply the psql hack.
The notion of customizing the psql prompt based on
in-an-xact-block-or-not seems cool; but I do not see how to do it
reliably without a protocol change, and it's not worth that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | bpalmer | 2002-02-22 16:33:34 | Re: Replication direction |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-22 16:15:11 | Re: CLUSTER TODO item |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2002-02-22 17:12:39 | Re: Automatic transactions in psql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-02-22 16:12:56 | Re: Automatic transactions in psql |