Re: Commitfest status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest status
Date: 2008-03-07 16:44:13
Message-ID: 17293.1204908253@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce, you are putting too much of the work on your own shoulders and
>> bottlenecking the whole process. Just dump stuff into the queue, don't
>> trim and for heavens sake stop fixing "simple" things as you go. Once
>> the queue is there we can spread around the work of processing the
>> items.

> OK, you asked for it. All emails have been moved from pgpatches_hold to
> pgpatches. There are 19 pages. Let the pain begin!
> http://momjian.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

OK, so now we need to actually divvy up the work somehow. Anyone want
to take any particular pieces of this? I think the first step is triage
--- which items actually need review now, which are dead or should
become TODO entries, and which are trivial enough to just deal with
without review. (Bruce, I guess you already did that on a portion
of this list, but which portion?)

Since there are 19 pages and probably less than 19 interested hackers,
maybe we could just each take a page of the list as it stands and go
through it at that level? Although many of the threads cross pages, so
that's not ideal. Any other ideas?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-07 16:48:27 Re: Commitfest status
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-03-07 16:40:09 Re: Commitfest status