Re: "Idle in Transaction" and hung connections

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Gregory S(dot) Williamson" <gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Idle in Transaction" and hung connections
Date: 2004-04-29 22:03:27
Message-ID: 17271.1083276207@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Gregory S. Williamson" <gsw(at)globexplorer(dot)com> writes:
> Very occasionally we will see a thread go wild, taking up a huge
> amount of processor time (the load will climb by "1" for each process
> -- usual load is around .2, when these hit the load rises to 1.x all
> the way up to a load of about 40 once). The pg_stat_activity shows
> these conections as being old -- much older than any live thread. All
> such connections are in a state of "IDLE IN TRANSACTION" which seems
> odd

This is not unexpected due to the way JDBC (mis)uses BEGIN/COMMIT.
However it is strange that such a connection would start using
a significant amount of CPU time. It should be waiting for a new
client query.

> Does anyone have any ideas what might be triggering this ?

No. Try attaching to a looping backend with gdb so you can get a stack
trace. I would suggest something along the lines of

gdb /path/to/postgres PID
bt
cont
... wait a few seconds, press control-C, and again do:
bt
cont
... lather, rinse, repeat a few times, then control-C and:
quit

Comparison of four or five stack traces obtained this way should make it
fairly clear where the loop is, and then we can determine whether we
need more info to solve it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory S. Williamson 2004-04-29 22:08:12 Re: "Idle in Transaction" and hung connections
Previous Message Karl O. Pinc 2004-04-29 21:56:01 Plpgsql problem passing ROWTYPE to function