Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: khuddleston(at)pivotal(dot)io, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types
Date: 2017-06-15 04:53:54
Message-ID: 1724.1497502434@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> ... but yeah, as long as we're supporting it at all, that shouldn't
>> happen. Thanks for the report!

> Tom, are you working on a patch? At quick glance, this is just missing a
> call to recordDependencyOn() in SetFunctionReturnType().

No, I'm going to bed soon. If you want to fix this, have at it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2017-06-15 05:59:21 Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-06-15 04:52:01 Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types