From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: should we document an example to set multiple libraries in shared_preload_libraries? |
Date: | 2021-12-01 13:15:04 |
Message-ID: | 1721781.1638364504@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> +1 to document it, but it seems like the worse problem is allowing the admin to
> write a configuration which causes the server to fail to start, without having
> issued a warning.
> I think you could fix that with a GUC check hook to emit a warning.
> I'm not sure what objections people might have to this. Maybe it's confusing
> to execute preliminary verification of the library by calling stat() but not do
> stronger verification for other reasons the library might fail to load. Like
> it doesn't have the right magic number, or it's built for the wrong server
> version. Should factor out the logic from internal_load_library and check
> those too ?
Considering the vanishingly small number of actual complaints we've
seen about this, that sounds ridiculously over-engineered.
A documentation example should be sufficient.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-12-01 13:16:24 | Re: Optionally automatically disable logical replication subscriptions on error |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-12-01 13:00:16 | Re: should we document an example to set multiple libraries in shared_preload_libraries? |