Re: Reconstructing FKs in pg_dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reconstructing FKs in pg_dump
Date: 2002-09-26 22:25:23
Message-ID: 17217.1033079123@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
>> However, if we are going to put that kind of knowledge into pg_dump,
>> it would only be a small further step to have it dump these triggers
>> as ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT commands instead. Which would be a lot
>> better for forward compatibility than dumping the raw triggers.

> Wasn't there still some question about the fact that ATAC causes a
> check of the constraint which for large tables is not insignificant.
> I don't remember if there was any consensus on how to deal with that.

Hmm, good point. That's probably why we didn't go ahead and do it
already...

Maybe we should just put the lookup hack into the backend's CREATE
CONSTRAINT TRIGGER code and leave it at that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-09-26 22:26:53 Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-26 22:22:45 Re: Reconstructing FKs in pg_dump