| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Doc comments on unsupported versions |
| Date: | 2018-02-19 05:09:59 |
| Message-ID: | 1720.1519016999@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> On Feb 17, 2018, at 1:35 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> I think yes, let's drop it for unsupported versions. The more we can make it clear to people that they're unsupported, the better.
> Just to argue the other side, just because the versions are unsupported
> does not mean that people are not using those versions and at scale.
> If there is something that is erroneous in the documentation, it would
> not hurt to fix it, and there is a chance it is incorrect in a supported version.
I can't see that we'd expend the effort to fix documentation in
de-supported versions. But certainly, if someone were to point out an
error that also exists in supported versions, we'd wish to fix it in the
supported versions. Is there a way, rather than just blocking comments on
the old versions, to provide a message to the effect of "please comment
on version x.y or newer, if the issue still exists there"?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-02-19 14:01:25 | Re: Doc comments on unsupported versions |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-02-19 03:27:07 | Re: Doc comments on unsupported versions |