Re: SQL/JSON: functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON: functions
Date: 2021-12-09 15:08:50
Message-ID: 171c5a4c-79b0-dc67-97eb-19aae1514cf4@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09.12.21 15:04, Himanshu Upadhyaya wrote:
> 1)
> Why we don't support KEY(however is optional as per SQL standard) keyword?
> SELECT JSON_OBJECT(KEY 'a' VALUE '123');
> ERROR:  type "key" does not exist
> LINE 1: SELECT JSON_OBJECT(KEY 'a' VALUE '123');
>
> ORACLE is supporting the above syntax.
>
> I can see TODO as below
> +json_name_and_value:
> +/* TODO This is not supported due to conflicts
> +                       KEY c_expr VALUE_P json_value_expr %prec POSTFIXOP
> +                               { $$ = makeJsonKeyValue($2, $4); }
> +                       |
> +*/
>
> but still not very clear what kind of conflict we are mentioning here,
> also any plan of finding a solution to that conflict?

The conflict is this:

Consider in subclause 6.33, “<JSON value constructor>”:

<JSON name and value> ::= [ KEY ] <JSON name> VALUE <JSON input expression>
| ...

Because KEY is a <non-reserved word>, this creates an ambiguity. For
example:

key(x) VALUE foo

could be

KEY x VALUE foo

with KEY being the key word and “x” (a <column reference>) as “<JSON
name>”, or

KEY key(x) VALUE foo

with “key(x)” (a <routine invocation>) as “<JSON name>”.

In existing implementations, KEY is resolved as a keyword. So if you
can figure out a way to implement that, go ahead, but I imagine it might
be tricky.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-12-09 15:24:23 Re: Post-CVE Wishlist
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-12-09 14:42:19 Re: port conflicts when running tests concurrently on windows.