Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend code for Wi

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend code for Wi
Date: 2018-09-17 13:41:37
Message-ID: 17194.1537191697@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> OK, REL_11_STABLE has been patched as well, after doing a couple of
> extra tests on Windows.

BTW, I'm a bit concerned by the fact that bowerbird has failed its
last couple of HEAD runs at the pgbench step. The first such
failure was here:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bowerbird&dt=2018-09-15%2014%3A19%3A58

Looking at the set of commits between the prior run and that one,
it's hard to see anything that could have triggered the test failures
other than this patch --- but I also don't see how this patch would've
blown up pgbench without breaking earlier tests. Ideas?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-17 14:02:02 Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend code for Wi
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-17 11:49:30 Re: pgsql: Improve autovacuum logging for aggressive and anti-wraparound ru

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-17 14:02:02 Re: pgsql: Allow concurrent-safe open() and fopen() in frontend code for Wi
Previous Message Chris Travers 2018-09-17 13:28:02 Strange OSX make check-world failure