From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Chris Hoover <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org Admin" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.2.4 Won't Build 8.1 Functional Indexes |
Date: | 2007-06-06 23:41:26 |
Message-ID: | 17138.1181173286@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> You can't do this because to_date and other functions are not immutable.
> 8.2 seems to be more picky about this -- the date conversions of
> timestamptz columns are dependent on the current timezone.
The reason 8.2 is more picky is that the function is less immutable
thanks to the addition of locale-dependent functionality:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00264.php
I gather that the underlying column is timestamp without tz, or it would
never have worked in 8.1 either. That being the case, these index
definitions seem pretty darn stupid anyway --- why aren't you just
indexing on date_trunc or a plain cast to date?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Koczan | 2007-06-07 00:51:15 | Re: troubleshooting "idle in transaction" |
Previous Message | Raul Retamozo | 2007-06-06 23:09:03 | copying data into another database ? (replication) |