Re: pg_upgrade permission check

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade permission check
Date: 2011-05-16 16:10:35
Message-ID: 17131.1305562235@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "full access permissions" seems unhelpfully vague. Why not say
>> "you must have both read and write access to the current directory"?

> OK, I can do that, but they need execute permission in that directory
> too to look up file names in there. Should I say execute too?

I doubt it's worth worrying about. man chdir saith

In order for a directory to become the current directory, a process must
have execute (search) access to the directory.

I'm not entirely certain what happens if you chdir into a directory and
then someone revokes the bit afterwards, but I do not feel a need to
complicate the error message to cover such a case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-05-16 16:32:56 Re: pg_upgrade permission check
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-05-16 15:57:38 Re: pg_upgrade permission check