Re: Closing some 8.4 open items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Date: 2009-04-05 18:07:32
Message-ID: 17101.1238954852@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 12:21:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I will leave that item on the Open Items list. I take it no one's
>> excited about the others?

> When the windowing functions become a pain point, let's revisit :)

The \df thing? That's something it'd be okay to revisit during beta,
IMHO. The things I'd really like to get right before beta are the ones
that are going to require an initdb to change. Like, say, the
cardinality() issue ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2009-04-05 18:19:25 Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-04-05 18:00:53 Re: Closing some 8.4 open items