From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andre Radke <lists(at)spicynoodles(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: problem with array of boxes |
Date: | 2002-03-14 19:45:00 |
Message-ID: | 17086.1016135100@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Andre Radke <lists(at)spicynoodles(dot)net> writes:
> I have run into a problem with the array of boxes datatype.
After a little poking at this, it seems that some parts of the array
support code may be failing to pay attention to "typdelim". Type box
has typdelim set to ';' (it's the only standard datatype whose typdelim
is not ','). Changing that to ',' made the behavior less unexpected.
Haven't dug into the code yet for a proper fix.
This does beg the question of whether box's typdelim should be ';'
rather than the standard ','. I can see why that was done: box likes
to use commas in its text representation. But I really wonder how
much client code will be prepared to cope with arrays represented
with ';' not ',' between items ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | raanders | 2002-03-14 20:06:13 | Re: temporary file location? |
Previous Message | David Siebert | 2002-03-14 19:42:36 | Re: PostgreSQL the right choice? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arguile | 2002-03-14 20:03:39 | Re: Client/Server compression? |
Previous Message | David Siebert | 2002-03-14 19:42:36 | Re: PostgreSQL the right choice? |