Re: search_path vs extensions

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions
Date: 2009-05-28 21:24:37
Message-ID: 1707C1FA-0FC7-4BC8-8C73-144E4A7D98EF@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 28, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Robert Haas wrote:

> It feels like a Java CLASSPATH,
> or installing every application into /usr/local/<application-name> so
> that your path has 50 bin directories in it.

+1 Yeah, that was my trouble with it.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-05-28 21:26:20 Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-05-28 21:23:17 Re: search_path vs extensions