Re: Typo in pg_db_role_setting.h

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Typo in pg_db_role_setting.h
Date: 2022-08-01 14:16:08
Message-ID: 1707698.1659363368@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> You are correct, but I wonder if it'd be better to just drop the comment
> entirely. I checked a couple other random headers with function
> declarations and they didn't have such a comment, and it's kind of obvious
> what they're for.

Some places have these, some don't. It's probably more useful where
a header foo.h is declaring functions that aren't in the obviously
corresponding foo.c file, or live in multiple files. In this case
I agree it's not adding much.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-08-01 14:20:37 Re: Triggers should work in isolation, with a final conflict detection step
Previous Message Zhang Mingli 2022-08-01 13:56:14 [feature]COPY FROM enable FORCE_NULL/FORCE_NOT_NULL on all columns