From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Standalone backends run StartupXLOG in an incorrect environment |
Date: | 2010-04-19 17:01:04 |
Message-ID: | 17070.1271696464@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you think we're at the point where this item is the main thing
>> standing between us and beta, I'll go do something about it. I've
>> been waiting for the HS code to settle before trying to design a
>> solution...
> I'm not hugely interested in supporting HS in standalone backends.
I'm not either. The type of scenario that I'm worried about is someone
trying to use a standalone backend to clean up after a recovery failure.
Right now I'm afraid that could make things worse (ie create additional
corruption).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-19 17:24:45 | Re: cost_rescan (was: match_unsorted_outer() vs. cost_nestloop()) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2010-04-19 16:47:42 | Re: idle in txn query cancellation |