Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date: 2005-04-02 06:31:13
Message-ID: 1706.1112423473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Also, since plPerlNG is maintained on PgFoundry, are the changes you are
> making to core getting migrated back to the main project itself?

I don't know, and not being a maintainer of the pgfoundry project,
it is *definitely* not my problem. But I cannot believe it's a
good idea to have two supposedly authoritative CVS repositories
for the same code...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-04-02 07:46:50 Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-02 06:21:21 Re: Debugging deadlocks

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Qingqing Zhou 2005-04-02 07:19:17 Re: invalidating cached plans
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-02 06:21:21 Re: Debugging deadlocks