BUG #17048: about trace_locks parameter problem

From: PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: leiyanliang(at)highgo(dot)com
Subject: BUG #17048: about trace_locks parameter problem
Date: 2021-06-04 22:46:48
Message-ID: 17048-771af7a9c54fea93@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 17048
Logged by: yanliang lei
Email address: leiyanliang(at)highgo(dot)com
PostgreSQL version: 13.3
Operating system: CentOS7.6
Description:

in the following SQL statement's result ,there is no trace_locks
parameter.
but in the
documents(https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-developer.html),there
is trace_locks parameter

this problem also applies to PostgreSQL 14 Beta1 Version。

postgres=# select name from pg_settings where name like '%lock%';
name
--------------------------------
block_size
deadlock_timeout
lock_timeout
log_lock_waits
max_locks_per_transaction
max_pred_locks_per_page
max_pred_locks_per_relation
max_pred_locks_per_transaction
wal_block_size
(9 rows)

postgres=# select name from pg_settings where name='trace_locks';
---->>>there is no trace_locks parameter
name
------
(0 rows)

postgres=# select version();
version

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 13.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.8.5
20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-44), 64-bit
(1 row)

postgres=#

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Schneider 2021-06-04 23:07:02 Re: logical decoding bug: segfault in ReorderBufferToastReplace()
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-06-04 18:30:48 Re: error dowloading posgresql