From: | PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | dilerie01(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Grammar suggestion |
Date: | 2024-01-08 13:31:36 |
Message-ID: | 170472069665.664.18333923743276806522@wrigleys.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/ddl-constraints.html
Description:
Dear postgres Team,
I happened to have stumbled across a tricky to read sentence in Ch. 5.45
'Foreign Keys' (Postgres Version 15).
The original sentence: "Normally, a referencing row need not satisfy the
foreign key constraint if any of its referencing columns are null".
Here's the revised version: "Normally, a referencing row does not need to
satisfy the foreign key constraint if any of its referencing columns are
null."
A bit restructuring in beginning of this sentence can it make it
grammatically complete and clear for the reader.
Kindly yours,
Sayed Dileri.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-01-08 15:19:06 | Re: Grammar suggestion |
Previous Message | Matthew Gwillam | 2024-01-07 14:54:36 | max_parallel_maintenance_workers additional clarification regarding autovacuum |