Grammar suggestion

From: PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: dilerie01(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Grammar suggestion
Date: 2024-01-08 13:31:36
Message-ID: 170472069665.664.18333923743276806522@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/ddl-constraints.html
Description:

Dear postgres Team,

I happened to have stumbled across a tricky to read sentence in Ch. 5.45
'Foreign Keys' (Postgres Version 15).

The original sentence: "Normally, a referencing row need not satisfy the
foreign key constraint if any of its referencing columns are null".

Here's the revised version: "Normally, a referencing row does not need to
satisfy the foreign key constraint if any of its referencing columns are
null."

A bit restructuring in beginning of this sentence can it make it
grammatically complete and clear for the reader.

Kindly yours,
Sayed Dileri.

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2024-01-08 15:19:06 Re: Grammar suggestion
Previous Message Matthew Gwillam 2024-01-07 14:54:36 max_parallel_maintenance_workers additional clarification regarding autovacuum