"Eugene M. Zheganin" <emz(at)norma(dot)perm(dot)ru> writes:
> Just example. I have an table in ISP billing base, which every 2
> months grows and contains up to 35,000,000 of records. That takes
> 13Gb of disk space. On that amount 'vacuum analyze' (every night) is
> inefficient, cause after it the table continues to grow (but not
> very fast).
If you aren't getting results from plain vacuum then you need to
increase your FSM settings.
regards, tom lane