Re: postgresql with storage

From: Lee Azzarello <lee(at)dropio(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql with storage
Date: 2009-02-26 16:43:06
Message-ID: 16b031c0902260843o21187a53k4ce476748153adf1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Nagalingam, Karthikeyan
<KARTHIKEYAN(dot)Nagalingam(at)netapp(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some basic query in postgresql with storage, Please help me for the
> following
>
> 1. What is the best practice to use postgresql with storage.

Depends on your workload. My workload has a high number of DELETE
statements with a relatively small total set size of recurring SELECT
statements, therefore the buffer cache gets filled quickly and reads
rarely touch disk, though the disks stays busy from the DELETES. In
general, throw as much as you can at the disks unless the budget
prevents your from doing so.

Also, watch out for cheap three disk RAID-5 arrays. There's a crop of
low end servers that have these. Serious trouble.

> 2. Which are the files and folders we can keep it in storage.

The postgresql installation manual documents the location of a cluster on disk.

-lee

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-02-26 17:18:00 Re: Question to transaction ID wraparound
Previous Message Lee Azzarello 2009-02-26 16:36:36 Re: index for inet(ip address or ip range)