Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported
Date: 2018-06-05 07:37:30
Message-ID: 16a6f697-369f-8392-9515-ae02c2dcf442@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/06/05 1:25, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> In the meantime, my inclination is to fix the documentation to point out
> that AFTER triggers are allowed but BEFORE triggers are not.

Wasn't that already fixed by bcded2609ade6?

We don't say anything about AFTER triggers per se, but the following under
the limitations of partitioned tables:

BEFORE ROW triggers, if necessary, must be defined on individual
partitions, not the partitioned table.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2018-06-05 07:41:47 Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-06-05 07:35:13 Re: Spilling hashed SetOps and aggregates to disk