Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and

From: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and
Date: 2005-03-23 22:53:22
Message-ID: 16961.62306.731158.792599@giles.gnomon.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce> o Interpret INTERVAL '1 year' MONTH as

I'm still not convinced that allowing this doesn't just create
unnecessary confusion. How about:

o Decide whether constructs such as INTERVAL '1 year' MONTH should
be allowed, and if so what they should mean, eg perhaps CAST
(INTERVAL '1 year' AS INTERVAL MONTH)

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roy Badami 2005-03-23 22:56:44 Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-03-23 22:52:02 Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and