Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and

From: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month and
Date: 2005-03-23 22:10:30
Message-ID: 16961.59734.409675.896781@giles.gnomon.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce> Here is an email stating it is implementation defined:

Bruce> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-03/msg00162.php

Hmm, looks like I'm mistaken, then. In fact the "whether to truncate
or round" bit suggests you should do one or the other, rather than
raise an exception.

Will have to take a look at the spec when I get a moment...

-roy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-03-23 22:13:40 Re: BUG #1552: massive performance hit between 7.4 and 8.0.1
Previous Message Roy Badami 2005-03-23 22:05:51 Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,