Re: point -> double,double ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: point -> double,double ?
Date: 2003-01-17 20:20:06
Message-ID: 16941.1042834806@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> point[0] and point[1]. Not sure if this is adequately documented.

> Thank you very much.

> It may also be that I just don't have the right book. The book I have seems to
> be more of a tutorial than a reference. Is there a recommended reference book
> for postgres?

Book? Save a tree, use the online manuals ;-). I find this particular
item documented at the bottom of

http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/functions-geometry.html

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2003-01-17 20:43:31 Re: double precision to numeric overflow error
Previous Message Dennis Gearon 2003-01-17 20:18:18 Constraint of only one legal value for a foreign key