lindebg <lindebg(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/19/2011 12:19 AM, lindebg(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>>> Thanks, in this case works :-) However, this does not solve all cases.
>>> Unlikely, but possible to create, cyclic case can not be restored:
Color me skeptical. Under what conceivable use-case could you have
functions that were mutually dependent in that way? And actually did
something useful (not recurse till stack overflow) when called?
regards, tom lane