Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> It isn't so much the alphabetical order, since there is only one
> trigger, but the concept that we now group all the _before_ triggers
> before the _after_ triggers.
But we've always done that. Has the example ever been correct?
I was intending to try it on older versions, but I don't actually
think it's ever acted like the docs said.
regards, tom lane