From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] BLCKSZ 0? |
Date: | 2001-02-28 04:46:09 |
Message-ID: | 16918.983335569@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Dominic J. Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org> writes:
> Any suggestion why postmaster/postgres would think it had been compiled
> with BLCKSZ 0? :
> root(at)blue:/usr/local/pgsql# su postgres -c "bin/postmaster -D
> /usr/local/pgsql/data "
> DEBUG: Data Base System is starting up at Tue Feb 27 22:31:51 2001
> FATAL 2: database was initialized with BLCKSZ 0,
> but the backend was compiled with BLCKSZ 8192.
> looks like you need to initdb.
Read that again --- it did *not* say it was compiled with BLCKSZ 0.
It said (or meant, anyway) it found zero in the pg_control field that
indicates the BLCKSZ in use in the database. Something's broken with
your pg_control file ... care to give more details?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | will trillich | 2001-02-28 05:07:28 | Re: postgresql upgrade/downgrade -- a clue? |
Previous Message | Anand Raman | 2001-02-28 04:28:03 | Re: Find out when a table was last changed ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2001-02-28 06:57:50 | Re: [ODBC] Re: Release in 2 weeks ... |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-02-28 04:30:39 | Re: Re: Release in 2 weeks ... |