From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: NO INHERIT |
Date: | 2007-05-01 22:39:28 |
Message-ID: | 1691.1178059168@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 17:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> I notice that we have two versions of not INHERITing:
>>> ALTER ROLE meek NOINHERIT earth;
>>>
>>> ALTER TABLE meek NO INHERIT earth;
>>
>> Where are you reading that?
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-alterrole.html
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-altertable.html
Oh, you're complaining about the lack of parallelism between ALTER ROLE
and ALTER TABLE. They're not really that parallel anyway:
regression=# ALTER ROLE meek NOINHERIT earth;
ERROR: syntax error at or near "earth"
LINE 1: ALTER ROLE meek NOINHERIT earth;
^
regression=#
It's actually "ALTER ROLE meek NOINHERIT", which is spelled that way
because user/role related options have always been spelled that way:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/6.4/static/sql-createuser.htm
Maybe we'd do it differently if we were starting over, but I don't
see a point in changing it now.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ale Raza | 2007-05-01 22:44:33 | Re: Where to find kind code for STATISTIC_KIND GEOMETRY? |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-05-01 22:28:35 | Re: NO INHERIT |