From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Strange interval arithmetic |
Date: | 2005-12-01 20:49:36 |
Message-ID: | 16909.1133470176@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Here is the patch I was working on. It does us a separate libpq
> strtol() function, but I question whether it is worth it, or if it is
> meaningful when used by FRONTEND applications. Anyway, I am just
> throwing it out if it gives others ideas.
I did look through all the other calls to strtol/strtoul, and concluded
that the ones in datetime.c were the only undefended ones that really
needed a check.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-01 20:50:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Strange interval arithmetic |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-12-01 20:45:38 | Re: Strange interval arithmetic |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-01 20:50:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Strange interval arithmetic |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-12-01 20:49:06 | Re: Check for integer overflow in datetime functions |