From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Elliot Lee <sopwith(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fix disabled triggers with deferred constraints |
Date: | 2002-08-07 16:46:23 |
Message-ID: | 16877.1028738783@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> Elliot Lee <sopwith(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
> About as obscure a bug as you can get - without the patch, disabled
> triggers for deferred constraints get run anyways. The patch is simple and
> works, but the "right" (and more complicated) fix may involve not adding
> the trigger to event->dte_item to begin with.
>
> I remember looking at this issue and not doing anything because I
> couldn't decide whether the test for enabled status should occur when
> the trigger is queued or when it is executed --- or, perhaps, both?
> Is there anything in the standard about it?
>>
>> Was there any agreement on this?
> Any update on this?
I think we're still waiting for someone to figure out what the behavior
should be per spec.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-08-07 16:55:47 | Re: Proposal: stand-alone composite types |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2002-08-07 16:16:27 | Re: CLUSTER patch and regression test |