From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Date: | 2009-04-08 18:56:38 |
Message-ID: | 16841.1239216998@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Tom,
>> change cardinality() for multi-dim arrays?
>>
>> Drop; there's no consensus that this should be changed
> Andrew pinged me on this. While there's no consensus that it should be
> changed, there's no consensus it shouldn't, either. And once we release
> it, we've set the way it operates in cement, so I'd like to get a
> consensus one way or the other.
Yeah. I would like to change it; Peter evidently thinks it's good
as-is. Where do we go from here?
> For my part, I'd like to know what things other than arrays
> <collection_expression> in the standard applies to. I think the most
> sensible course is to make cardinality(array[]) behave consistently with
> cardinality(other_stuff) when we get around to implementing it.
There is no equivalent of multi-dimensional arrays in other kinds of
collections, so I'm not seeing that there is any good guide there.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-04-08 18:58:00 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2009-04-08 18:53:29 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |