Re: RI oddness

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Max Khon <fjoe(at)iclub(dot)nsu(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RI oddness
Date: 2001-04-26 16:41:41
Message-ID: 16808.988303301@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> What'd be easy is this:

> - We already have two entry points for INSERT/UPDATE on FK
> table, but the one for UPDATE is fortunately unused.

> - We change analyze.c to install the RI_FKey_check_upd
> trigger if the constraint has an ON DELETE SET DEFAULT
> clause. Otherwise it uses RI_FKey_check_ins as it does
> now.

Unfortunately, such a fix really isn't going to fly as a patch release.
Not only does it not work for existing tables, but it won't work for
tables created by dump and reload from a prior version (since they
won't have the right set of triggers ... another illustration of why
the lack of an abstract representation of the RI constraints was a
Bad Move). In fact I'm afraid that your proposed change would actively
break tables imported from a prior version; wouldn't RI_FKey_check_ins
do the wrong thing if applied as an update trigger?

> I think the usage of ON DELETE SET DEFAULT is a very rare
> case out in the field. Thus the dump/reload requirement is
> limited to a small number of databases (if any).

But dump/reload won't fix the tables' triggers.

Given that ON DELETE SET DEFAULT isn't used much, I think we should
not waste time creating an incomplete hack solution for 7.1.*, but
just write it off as a known bug and move forward with a real solution
for 7.2.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Victor Wagner 2001-04-26 16:51:25 Cyrillic to UNICODE conversion
Previous Message Barnes, Sandy (Sandra) 2001-04-26 16:36:51 applications hang when calling 'vacuum'