Re: [HACKERS] Updated 6.5 HISTORY

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updated 6.5 HISTORY
Date: 1999-05-25 00:26:53
Message-ID: 1680.927592013@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> Today I tried my test script (many tables joining) and got a crash.
> It works several days before. CPU usage shows only 5% loading during
> this test. what postgres is doing ? Hmm, just rerun the test and it
> works :-) OK, one more again and it crashed. Again - works. Again -
> crashed, crashed, crashed. Very unstable situation.

Oh dear ... can you provide a backtrace from one of the crashes?

> Does anybody tried sqlbench, posted by
> Edmund ? I tried several times on Linux box, FreeBSD box with current cvs
> and it never finished. RAM usage during the test was about 11-13 Mb
> and CPU usage was extremly low - 5-9% only !

It ran through to completion for me, but took hours. (Unfortunately
I only have access to one machine that has 700Mb of free disk space,
and I mustn't shut off the data collection task that is its primary load.
So I'm stuck with taking a long time to try the sqlbench stuff...
it does seem to work, but I can't say much about performance...)

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-05-25 00:30:42 Re: [HACKERS] Problem in S_LOCK?
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-05-25 00:20:04 Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE