From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #4410: Indexes not seen right away |
Date: | 2008-09-07 21:18:31 |
Message-ID: | 16773.1220822311@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs |
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)endpoint(dot)com> writes:
> I cannot reproduce, as this was on a production system and not seen again,
> but I created a simple index on a TEXT field, which was not chosen by the
> planner, even when seqscan was turned off. I analyzed the table, checked all
> the settings, etc. pg_index looked as it should. Eventually (~ 10 minutes
> later) the index as chosen - I don't know what might have triggered it to
> start appearing.
Does it have pg_index.indcheckxmin = true? If so, see README.HOT.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-07 23:58:06 | Re: non-deterministic error related to MIN/MAX optimization |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2008-09-07 21:04:03 | BUG #4410: Indexes not seen right away |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-08 06:56:35 | Re: Incorrect description of xmax and xip in functions docs |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2008-09-07 21:04:03 | BUG #4410: Indexes not seen right away |