| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: rules regression test failed on mingw |
| Date: | 2008-12-15 16:17:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1677.1229357857@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> while 'ch' and 'll' are independent letters they sort as they were 'c'
>> and 'l'... that means that 'ch' should go before 'ck'
> Interesting. So they are both wrong, glibc and teachers. We can file a
> bug with glibc but I'm not sure we can do a lot about the other "bug".
> Thanks for the research.
But I don't see this sorting behavior with glibc on Linux (Fedora 9 to
be exact, testing LC_COLLATE=es_ES.utf8). Does the mingw build actually
use glibc's strcoll() code, or is it somehow depending on Windows system
functionality?
I'm also wondering if the behavior is somehow affected by encoding ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2008-12-15 16:23:45 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-12-15 16:01:48 | Re: rules regression test failed on mingw |