| From: | PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | dwayne(dot)towell(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | MERGE examples not clear |
| Date: | 2023-02-21 15:14:17 |
| Message-ID: | 167699245721.1902146.6479762301617101634@wrigleys.postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-merge.html
Description:
On this page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/sql-merge.html
the first and second examples seems to be contrasted (by "this would be
exactly equivalent to the following statement"), however the difference does
not seem to related to the stated reason ("the MATCHED result does not
change"). It seems like the difference should involve the order of WHEN
clauses?
Of course, it might be that I don't understand the point, in which case
maybe the point could be stated more clearly?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-02-21 15:56:50 | Re: MERGE examples not clear |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2023-02-21 14:50:04 | Re: February 9th, 2023 Release links to a missing page |