Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com, shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows
Date: 2024-01-11 04:02:00
Message-ID: 16764.1704945720@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> I am wondering if we'd better backpatch all that, TBH.

Seems like a good idea to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-01-11 04:11:44 Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
Previous Message Dian Fay 2024-01-11 03:57:33 Re: add function argument names to regex* functions.