Re: index not used?

From: Dan Pelleg <daniel+pgsql(at)pelleg(dot)org>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: index not used?
Date: 2004-10-20 15:45:26
Message-ID: 16758.34838.167915.510242@lark.auton.cs.cmu.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Scott Marlowe writes:
> On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 08:06, Dan Pelleg wrote:
> > I'm trying to access a table with about 120M rows. It's a vertical version
> > of a table with 360 or so columns. The new columns are: original item col,
> > original item row, and the value.
> >
> > I created an index:
> >
> > CREATE INDEX idx on table (col, row)
> >
> > however, selects are still very slow. It seems it still needs a sequential
> > scan:
> >
> > EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM table WHERE col=1 AND row=10;
> > QUERY PLAN
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Seq Scan on table (cost=100000000.00..102612533.00 rows=1 width=14)
> > Filter: ((col = 1) AND ("row" = 10))
> >
> > What am I doing wrong?
>
> What type are row and col? If they're bigint (i.e. not int / int4) then
> you might need to quote the value to get the query to use an index:
>
> SELECT * FROM table WHERE col='1' AND row='10';
>
> also, have you vacuumed / analyzed the table? I'm assuming yes.

They're not bigints:

CREATE TABLE table (col int2, row integer, val double precision)

Yes, I vacuumed and analyzed, right after creating the index. Should I try
and issue a few queries beforehand?

--Dan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aaron Mulder 2004-10-20 15:47:12 Free PostgreSQL Training, Philadelphia, Oct 30
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2004-10-20 15:44:06 Re: index not used?