| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: List removals |
| Date: | 2017-12-04 14:42:34 |
| Message-ID: | 16746.1512398554@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Andres Freund (andres(at)anarazel(dot)de) wrote:
>> How about just redirecting some of them to more appropriate lists
>> instead?
> They'd screw up people's filters, we're trying to deprecate the
> @postgresql.org list aliases, we'd end up making those lists look
> active through the archives when they really aren't (without more code
> anyway), and, frankly, I just don't see there really being value to it.
I think a bounce would be fine if the bounce message contained something
like "this list is inactive, please send to <xxx(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
instead". How feasible is that?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2017-12-04 18:03:38 | Re: List removals |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-12-04 13:35:37 | Re: List removals |