Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Siegmar <oliver(at)siegmar(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps
Date: 2005-04-20 16:10:45
Message-ID: 1674.1114013445@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Oliver Siegmar <oliver(at)siegmar(dot)net> writes:
>> What datestyle are you using?

> Non-ISO (Postgres in that case), but the handling for non-ISO is all the same
> in interval.c ...

Yeah, I just confirmed here that it's broken the same way in all three
non-ISO datestyles. Will look into a fix later today.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-04-20 17:15:59 Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps
Previous Message Oliver Siegmar 2005-04-20 16:07:16 Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps