From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Alex J(dot) Avriette" <alex(at)posixnap(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf |
Date: | 2004-01-07 07:01:42 |
Message-ID: | 16734.1073458902@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Alex J. Avriette" <alex(at)posixnap(dot)net> writes:
> Given on both Solaris (my database server) and OpenBSD (the machine from
> which that manpage came from) I can connect to 127.1, I think you must
> be mistaken here. What made you think that it isn't supported?
AFAICT, our code simply hands the string off to a C library function ---
either getaddrinfo() or inet_aton() depending on what your platform has.
If it's not behaving the way you want, it's the fault of one of those
routines.
Just to verify, I changed "127.0.0.1" to "127.1" in my local pg_hba.conf
(this is on HPUX 10.20, which has inet_aton but not getaddrinfo), and
could still connect over localhost TCP ... then changed it to "127.2",
and could not connect. So I don't believe there is anything in the PG
code that is discriminating against addresses written this way.
If you still think the problem is PG's and not your C library's, I
invite you to trace through the code and show where we're going wrong.
But right at the moment I don't believe this is our bug.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Keith C. Perry | 2004-01-07 07:14:51 | Re: Paypal WAS: PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON |
Previous Message | Keith C. Perry | 2004-01-07 06:57:02 | Re: Paypal WAS: PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON |