| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Michiel Lange <michiel(at)minas(dot)demon(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] Cannot connect to the database (PG 7.3) |
| Date: | 2003-01-29 02:00:52 |
| Message-ID: | 16720.1043805652@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
"Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> How about throwing an error if an all digit user name is given to create
> user as already alluded to?
I do *not* want to do that; that's creating a user-visible restriction
for the convenience of one very small part of the implementation. I
think this behavior is a bug, and we should fix it not institutionalize
the misbehavior. Just haven't figured out how, yet.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-29 04:40:58 | Re: [ADMIN] Cannot connect to the database (PG 7.3) |
| Previous Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2003-01-29 01:44:55 | Re: [ADMIN] Cannot connect to the database (PG 7.3) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-01-29 02:02:05 | Re: Request for qualified column names |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-29 01:50:58 | Testing for int64 (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/ /configure /configure.in...) |