From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Call for platforms |
Date: | 2001-03-23 06:08:06 |
Message-ID: | 16705.985327686@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> For the regression test, I got 7 failures, most of them seem harmless,
> the only concern I have is bit test though.
Most of the diffs derive from what I recall to be a known SunOS problem,
that strtol fails to notice overflow. A value that should be rejected
is getting inserted into int4_tbl (mod 2^32 of course).
The bit test diffs seem to indicate that bit_cmp is messed up. That
depends on memcmp. I seem to recall something about memcmp not being
8-bit-clean on SunOS ... does that ring a bell with anyone?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-03-23 06:31:43 | Re: Call for platforms |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-03-23 05:31:27 | Re: Call for platforms |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rainer Mager | 2001-03-23 06:19:36 | Problems with latest tests |
Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-03-23 05:31:27 | Re: Call for platforms |